Bahrain Advocates for Peace and UN Reform at Secur
During a UN Security Council debate, Bahrain emphasized the need for UN reform and a commitment to p
Canada’s new asylum and immigration law is creating growing fear among many refugee claimants, especially members of the 2SLGBTQ+ community, who say the tougher rules could leave them at risk of deportation to countries where they may face violence, discrimination or imprisonment. Human rights groups and immigration advocates warn that the new measures could make it much harder for vulnerable people to receive protection in Canada.
The concerns are linked to Bill C-12, officially called the Strengthening Canada’s Immigration System and Borders Act, which recently became law. The Canadian government says the legislation is designed to reduce pressure on the asylum system, close loopholes and improve border security. However, refugee organizations argue the new rules may unfairly block legitimate asylum seekers from receiving a full hearing before Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Board.
One of the biggest changes introduced by the law is a strict new eligibility deadline. Under the rules, asylum seekers who have been in Canada for more than one year after first entering the country may no longer be allowed to formally present their refugee claim before the Immigration and Refugee Board. Another rule affects people entering Canada from the United States between official border crossings. If they wait more than 14 days before making an asylum claim, they may also lose access to the regular refugee process.
Advocates for 2SLGBTQ+ refugees say these changes are especially dangerous for people fleeing persecution because many individuals may need time before feeling safe enough to publicly discuss their sexual orientation or gender identity. Some asylum seekers reportedly avoid making claims immediately because they fear authorities, lack legal support or are traumatized by experiences in their home countries.
Human rights groups have warned that some people could now face deportation without receiving a complete refugee hearing. Amnesty International criticized the law and said it risks violating Canada’s international obligations toward refugees and asylum seekers. Critics argue the system may create a situation where vulnerable migrants remain trapped in legal uncertainty without proper protection.
The debate has also renewed criticism of the Canada–United States Safe Third Country Agreement, which requires many refugee claimants to seek asylum in the first “safe” country they enter. Activists and refugee organizations argue that recent immigration crackdowns and deportation policies in the United States have made the agreement increasingly controversial, especially for migrants fearing persecution.
Supporters of the new law defend the changes by saying Canada’s asylum system has faced increasing pressure from rising migration numbers in recent years. Government officials argue the reforms are necessary to prevent abuse of the refugee system and speed up processing for legitimate claims. Officials also note that people affected by the new restrictions can still apply for a pre-removal risk assessment, which is meant to prevent deportations to countries where individuals may face torture, persecution or serious harm.
Canada has historically been viewed as one of the world’s more welcoming countries for LGBTQ+ refugees. The federal government continues supporting programs that help resettle persecuted LGBTQI+ refugees through partnerships with organizations such as Rainbow Refugee Society. Still, advocacy groups warn that the new asylum restrictions may weaken those protections for people already inside Canada seeking safety.
Immigration lawyers and refugee organizations are now preparing possible legal challenges against parts of the legislation. Critics believe the courts may again examine whether Canada’s asylum rules fully respect the country’s Charter rights and international refugee obligations. Until then, many refugee claimants remain uncertain about their future and fearful about possible deportation if their cases are rejected under the new system.