Court Affirms DNAA Ruling for Ahmad Zahid in Corruption Case

Post by : Shakul

During a session on April 15, 2026, the Malaysian Court of Appeal revealed that the decision to grant Ahmad Zahid Hamidi a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) in his corruption allegations adhered strictly to the law. This information came forth in a hearing conducted in Putrajaya.

Senior federal counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly contended that the public prosecutor exercised constitutional powers appropriately when deciding on the DNAA. He asserted that this action was in full compliance with Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution and related sections of the Criminal Procedure Code.

The counsel emphasized that no legal policies were breached through this decision. He underlined the importance of maintaining independence in prosecutorial discretion, which cannot be influenced by external forces, thereby affirming the legality of the Attorney-General’s maneuvers in this case.

The prosecution elaborated on the reasons for halting the case, citing new evidence and issues that warranted further scrutiny. It was noted that proceeding without thorough examination of this new material could jeopardize the integrity of both the legal process and the involved investigative bodies.

Zahid faces multiple allegations, including criminal breach of trust, corruption, and money laundering tied to Yayasan Akalbudi funds. Importantly, much of the trial had already taken place, with numerous prosecution witnesses having provided their testimonies prior to the DNAA being granted.

Conversely, representatives from the Malaysian Bar have contested this ruling, claiming that prosecutorial discretion should always serve the public interest. They raised concerns over the timing of the decision, particularly given that the trial was at an advanced stage.

After considering arguments from both parties, the three-judge panel expressed the necessity for additional time to deliberate on the case. The court will announce its ruling in the future as the case garners ongoing public and legal attention in Malaysia.

April 15, 2026 3:16 p.m. 106

Malaysia News Business Updates Law Courtroom Justice